| From: | José Luis Tallón <jltallon(at)adv-solutions(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Default Roles |
| Date: | 2016-03-30 11:30:17 |
| Message-ID: | 56FBB8C9.8000009@adv-solutions.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
If this gets into 9.6, we give users another full release cycle to
ensure there are no reserved rolenames in use.
Then, I reckon that the additional roles/system-role-based fine-grained
authorization could go in for 9.7 without much trouble -- this is badly
needed, IMHO
Thank you, Stephen and all others who provided feedback.
On 03/30/2016 01:14 PM, Jose Luis Tallon wrote:
> The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
> make installcheck-world: tested, passed
> Implements feature: tested, passed
> Spec compliant: tested, passed
> Documentation: tested, passed
>
> * Applies cleanly to current master (3063e7a84026ced2aadd2262f75eebbe6240f85b)
> * ./configure && make -j4 ok
> [snip]
>
> Looking forward to seeing the other proposed default roles in!
>
>
> The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-30 11:48:59 | Re: Combining Aggregates |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2016-03-30 11:22:40 | Re: Using quicksort for every external sort run |