Re: Speedup twophase transactions

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Speedup twophase transactions
Date: 2016-03-29 15:04:46
Message-ID: 56FA998E.1090009@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Stas,

On 3/22/16 9:20 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:

> Not taking ProcArrayLock here?
>
> The comment at the top of XlogReadTwoPhaseData is incorrect.
>
> RecoverPreparedFromXLOG and RecoverPreparedFromFiles have a lot of
> code in common, having this duplication is not good, and you could
> simplify your patch.

It looks like you should post a new patch or respond to Michael's
comments. Marked as "waiting on author".

Thanks,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sridhar N Bamandlapally 2016-03-29 15:09:10 Re: pg_largeobject
Previous Message David Steele 2016-03-29 15:01:45 Re: OOM in libpq and infinite loop with getCopyStart()