Re: snapshot too old, configured by time

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: snapshot too old, configured by time
Date: 2016-03-29 13:58:24
Message-ID: 56FA8A00.3030700@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Kevin,

On 3/21/16 4:05 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:

> Thanks to all for the feedback; I will try to respond later this
> week. First I'm trying to get my reviews for other patches posted.

We're getting to the end of the CF now. Do you know when you'll have an
updated patch ready?

Thanks,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2016-03-29 14:01:21 Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Previous Message David Steele 2016-03-29 13:56:30 Re: PoC: Partial sort