From: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias Kurz <m(dot)kurz(at)irregular(dot)at>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Alter or rename enum value |
Date: | 2016-03-29 06:57:17 |
Message-ID: | 56FA274D.4020108@BlueTreble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/28/16 4:42 AM, Emre Hasegeli wrote:
> Now, we are using a
> function to replace an enum type on all tables with another one, but
> we are not at all happy with this solution. It requires all objects
> which were using the enum to be dropped and recreated, and it rewrites
> the tables, so it greatly increases the migration time and effort.
FWIW, there are ways to avoid some of that pain by having a trigger
maintain the new column on INSERT/UPDATE and then slowly touching all
the old rows where the new column is NULL.
Obviously would be much better if we could just do this with ENUMs...
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christoph Moench-Tegeder | 2016-03-29 07:01:34 | Re: pthread portability |
Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2016-03-29 06:46:34 | Re: backup tools ought to ensure created backups are durable |