Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com, thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, thom(at)linux(dot)com, memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date: 2016-03-28 09:25:47
Message-ID: 56F8F89B.3080906@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016/03/28 17:50, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
>
> # LISPers don't hesitate to dive into Sea of Parens.

Sorry in advance to be off-topic: https://xkcd.com/297 :)

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2016-03-28 09:31:09 Re: Draft release notes for next week's releases
Previous Message Rajkumar Raghuwanshi 2016-03-28 09:17:02 Postgres_fdw join pushdown - INNER - FULL OUTER join combination generating wrong result