Re: [PATCH] Phrase search ported to 9.6

On 25.03.2016 21:42, Dmitry Ivanov wrote:
> Sorry for the delay, I desperately needed some time to finish a bunch of
> dangling tasks.
>
> I've added some new comments and clarified the ones that were obscure.
> Moreover, I felt an urge to recheck most parts of the code since apparently
> nobody (besides myself) has gone so far yet.
>
> On 25.03.16 18:42 MSK, David Steele wrote:
>> Time is short and it's not encouraging that you say there is "still much
> work to be done".
>
> Indeed, I was inaccurate. I am more than interested in the positive outcome.
>

Hi,

Thank you for your work!

I tested the patch and take a look on it. All regression tests passed.
The code looks good and the patch introduce a great functionality.

I think the patch can be marked as "Ready for Commiter". But I do not
feel the force to do that myself.

Also I agree with you about tsvector_setweight(). There is not a problem
with it because this weights are immutable and so there is not benefits
from new function.

--
Artur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company