Re: btree_gin and btree_gist for enums

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Matt Wilmas <pgsql_lists(at)realplain(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: btree_gin and btree_gist for enums
Date: 2016-03-25 18:55:24
Message-ID: 56F5899C.7060808@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/24/2016 12:40 PM, Matt Wilmas wrote:
> (I notice the btree_gin docs don't mention "numeric," but it works.)
>

Numeric does work - we have regression tests to prove it, do we should
fix the docs. But I'm also curious to know why apparently we don't have
distance operator support for numeric.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2016-03-25 19:17:00 Re: Alter or rename enum value
Previous Message Peter Krauss 2016-03-25 18:51:58 help for old extension, first_last_agg bug in install with pg9.5