Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, pokurev(at)pm(dot)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, bannos(at)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.
Date: 2016-03-25 00:23:51
Message-ID: 56F48517.8070904@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016/03/24 22:01, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> - values[i+3] =
>> UInt32GetDatum(beentry->st_progress_param[i]);
>> + values[i+3] =
>> Int64GetDatum(beentry->st_progress_param[i]);
>>
>>
>> Attached patch fixes this.
>
> Uggh, what a stupid mistake on my part.
>
> Committed. Thanks for the patch.

Thanks Rahila and Robert.

- Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-03-25 00:28:18 Re: Proposal: "Causal reads" mode for load balancing reads without stale data
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2016-03-25 00:22:49 Re: [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.