From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Matt Wilmas <pgsql_lists(at)realplain(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: btree_gin and btree_gist for enums |
Date: | 2016-03-24 22:18:00 |
Message-ID: | 56F46798.60605@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/24/2016 12:40 PM, Matt Wilmas wrote:
>
>
> It would be *really* nice to have this in 9.6. It seems it's simply
> filling out functionality that should already be there, right? An
> oversight/bug fix so it works "as advertised?" :-)
I think that would be stretching the process a bit far. I'm certainly
not prepared to commit it unless there is a general consensus to make an
exception for it.
> Is any other btree type-compatibility missing from these modules? (I
> notice the btree_gin docs don't mention "numeric," but it works.)
uuid would be another type that should be fairly easily covered but isn't.
>
>
> I just looked over the patch, and the actual code addition/changes
> seem pretty small and straightforward (or am I wrong?).
Yes, sure, it's all fairly simple. Took me a little while to understand
what I was doing, but once I did it was pretty much plain sailing.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2016-03-24 22:21:14 | Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-03-24 22:12:45 | Re: [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index. |