Re: Partitioning and ORM tools

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Partitioning and ORM tools
Date: 2016-03-23 01:49:37
Message-ID: 56F1F631.9040508@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 3/22/2016 2:20 PM, CS DBA wrote:
>> I would think the ORM (as yet undefined) would want to think in terms
>> of the parent table and not know about the physical schema details.
>> Can the client not be written to check only for errors vs checking
>> for non-zero inserts?
>>
>>
>>
> That was our first suggestion, they don;t want to make any app changes

so they want someone else to make major architectural changes. great.

--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Travers 2016-03-23 08:39:32 Re: Partitioning and ORM tools
Previous Message Manuel Kniep 2016-03-22 22:35:26 Re: Partitioning and ORM tools