Re: Should pgFoundry mentions be nuked from the wiki?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should pgFoundry mentions be nuked from the wiki?
Date: 2016-03-22 02:54:39
Message-ID: 56F0B3EF.5040100@commandprompt.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On 03/21/2016 06:57 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
> When looking through the wiki, there are various mentions
> of pgFoundry around. They're not really pointing out that
> it's extremely legacy/unwanted ;>, and to not put new projects
> on there.
>
> Should we remove the references to it, or make them explicity
> say something like "Do Not Use pgFoundry for new projects", or
> <other suggestions welcome>? :)

As far as I know, any active project has moved from pgFoundry. The best
solution is to find where the new home is and update the links.

It is correct that .Org does not endorse PgFoundry due to reliability
issues.

>
> + Justin
>
>

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2016-03-22 14:22:34 request for wiki editor privileges
Previous Message Justin Clift 2016-03-22 01:57:12 Should pgFoundry mentions be nuked from the wiki?