|From:||Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>|
|To:||Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Subject:||Re: btree_gin and btree_gist for enums|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On 03/18/2016 09:54 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> On 03/17/2016 06:44 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>> Here is a patch to add enum support to btree_gin and btree_gist. I didn't
>>> include distance operations, as I didn't think it terribly important, and
>>> there isn't a simple way to compute it sanely and efficiently, so no KNN
>> This time including the data file for the gist regression tests.
> Are you intending this as a 9.7 submission? Because it's pretty late for 9.6.
I guess so. I would certainly find it hard to argue that it should be in
9.6 unless there is a consensus on it.
|Next Message||Tom Lane||2016-03-18 14:44:06||Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification|
|Previous Message||Tom Lane||2016-03-18 14:08:58||Re: Pushdown target list below gather node (WAS Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification)|