Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer)

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer)
Date: 2016-03-16 23:32:31
Message-ID: 56E9ED0F.2070303@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/10/16 1:24 PM, Corey Huinker wrote:

> New patch for Alvaro's consideration.
>
> Very minor changes since the last time, the explanations below are
> literally longer than the changes:
> - Rebased, though I don't think any of the files had changed in the
> mean time
> - Removed infinity checks/errors and the test cases to match
> - Amended documentation to add 'days' after 'step' as suggested
> - Did not add a period as suggested, to remain consistent with other
> descriptions in the same sgml table
> - Altered test case and documentation of 7 day step example so that
> the generated dates do not land evenly on the end date. A reader
> might incorrectly infer that the end date must be in the result set,
> when it doesn't have to be.
> - Removed unnecessary indentation that existed purely due to
> following of other generate_series implementations

As far as I can see overall support is in favor of this patch although
it is not overwhelming by any means.

I think in this case it comes down to a committer's judgement so I have
marked this "ready for committer" and passed the buck on to Álvaro.

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-03-16 23:39:17 Re: plpgsql - DECLARE - cannot to use %TYPE or %ROWTYPE for composite types
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-03-16 23:19:14 Re: [PATCH] Integer overflow in timestamp[tz]_part() and date/time boundaries check