Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)
Date: 2016-03-15 07:48:04
Message-ID: 56E7BE34.7030609@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016/03/15 16:42, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:31 AM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> By the way, one request (as a non-native speaker of English language, who
>> ends up looking up quite a few words regularly) -
>>
>> Could we use "conform" or "correspond" instead of "comport" in the
>> following error message:
>>
>> "left link/right link pair in index \"%s\" don't comport"
>
> OK. I'll do something about that.

Thanks a lot.

- Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2016-03-15 08:06:11 Missing conversion error handling in postgres_fdw
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-03-15 07:42:57 Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)