|From:||David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>|
|To:||Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox|
On 2/26/16 11:37 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com
> Here, we can see that there is a gain of ~15% to ~38% at higher
> client count.
> The attached document (perf_write_clogcontrollock_data_v6.ods)
> contains data, mainly focussing on single client performance. The
> data is for multiple runs on different machines, so I thought it is
> better to present in form of document rather than dumping everything
> in e-mail. Do let me know if there is any confusion in
> understanding/interpreting the data.
> Forgot to mention that all these tests have been done by
> reverting commit-ac1d794.
This patch no longer applies cleanly:
$ git apply ../other/group_update_clog_v6.patch
error: patch failed: src/backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c:404
error: src/backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: src/include/storage/proc.h:152
error: src/include/storage/proc.h: patch does not apply
It's not clear to me whether Robert has completed a review of this code
or it still needs to be reviewed more comprehensively.
Other than a comment that needs to be fixed it seems that all questions
have been answered by Amit.
Is this "ready for committer" or still in need of further review?
|Next Message||Robert Haas||2016-03-14 18:30:21||Re: Obsolete comment in postgres_fdw.c|
|Previous Message||Tom Lane||2016-03-14 18:28:43||Re: [PATCH] Use correct types and limits for PL/Perl SPI query results|