Re: Fuzzy substring searching with the pg_trgm extension

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Artur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fuzzy substring searching with the pg_trgm extension
Date: 2016-03-14 15:48:28
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Jeff,

On 2/25/16 5:00 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:

> But, It doesn't sound like I am going to win that debate. Given that,
> I don't think we need a different name for the function. I'm fine with
> explaining the word-boundary subtlety in the documentation, and
> keeping the function name itself simple.

It's not clear to me if you are requesting more documentation here or
stating that you are happy with it as-is. Care to elaborate?

Other than that I think this patch looks to be ready for committer. Any


In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Artur Zakirov 2016-03-14 15:59:54 Re: plpgsql - DECLARE - cannot to use %TYPE or %ROWTYPE for composite types
Previous Message David Steele 2016-03-14 15:32:31 Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol