Re: auto_explain sample rate

From: Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: auto_explain sample rate
Date: 2016-03-12 14:20:20
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/03/2016 17:55, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Tomas Vondra
> <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> A bit late, but I think we should rename the GUC variable to
>> "sampling_rate" (instead of sample_ratio) as that's what pgbench uses
>> for the same thing. That'd be more consistent.
> I like that idea. It seems like slightly better terminology.

I like it too. I also just noticed that I duplicated the var type by
mistake in the documentation :/

Attached patch fixes both.

Julien Rouhaud -

Attachment Content-Type Size
auto_explain_rate.diff text/plain 2.9 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2016-03-12 14:44:20 Re: Performance improvement for joins where outer side is unique
Previous Message Mithun Cy 2016-03-12 14:13:39 Re: Explain [Analyze] produces parallel scan for select Into table statements.