| From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Small patch for pgstat.c: fix comment + pgindent |
| Date: | 2016-03-10 09:15:34 |
| Message-ID: | 56E13B36.1020205@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Thanks for the report.
On 2016/03/10 18:05, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> Hello
>
> I noticed:
>
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=b6fb6471f6afaf649e52f38269fd8c5c60647669
>
> ... that comments for procedures pgstat_progress_update_param and
> pgstat_progress_end_command are identical. Here is a patch that fixes
> this. Also one empty line added after running pgindent on this file.
This was reported on an in-progress thread[1] and I sent a patch in reply:
Thanks,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-03-10 09:22:52 | Re: Improving replay of XLOG_BTREE_VACUUM records |
| Previous Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2016-03-10 09:05:06 | Small patch for pgstat.c: fix comment + pgindent |