Re: fun with "Ready for Committer" patches

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fun with "Ready for Committer" patches
Date: 2016-03-08 22:57:17
Message-ID: 56DF58CD.20006@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/08/2016 02:45 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> OK, so I made a pass through the "Ready for Committer" patches in the
> current CF. One I committed, several I replied to the thread with
> review comments and set back to "Waiting on Author". Here's where we
> are with the rest:

> plpgsql - possibility to get element or array type for referenced
> variable type - No committer yet. I don't have enough interest or
> knowledge to want to handle this.

I'll try to move this one forward, although later in the week as I am
traveling all day tomorrow

> pl/pgSQL, get diagnostics and big data - No committer yet. Seems like
> a reasonable concept. A borderline bug fix.

possibly this one too...

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Corey Huinker 2016-03-08 22:57:41 Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer)
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-03-08 22:54:15 Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions