Re: Proposal: RETURNING primary_key()

From: "Igal (at) Lucee(dot)org" <igal(at)lucee(dot)org>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ian Barwick <ian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: RETURNING primary_key()
Date: 2016-03-08 21:40:18
Message-ID: 56DF46C2.9040805@lucee.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/8/2016 12:12 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> I agree that some research should be done on how this works in other
> systems, but I think we have a general problem with the server lacking
> certain capabilities that make it easy to implement a high-quality
> JDBC driver. And I think it would be good to work on figuring out how
> to fix that.
I will try to gather more information about the other DBMSs and drivers
and will post my findings here when I have them.

Best,

Igal

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-03-08 21:42:37 Re: Idle In Transaction Session Timeout, revived
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-03-08 21:27:44 Re: More stable query plans via more predictable column statistics