Re: PATCH: pgbench - merging transaction logs

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: pgbench - merging transaction logs
Date: 2015-03-23 19:11:10
Message-ID: 56DC0C49-7E56-4A43-8230-6D62C6C74D91@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On March 23, 2015 8:00:04 PM GMT+01:00, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:
>
>> Guys, I don't see this theoretical discussion going anywhere. I think
>> it's time to simply implement this and evaluate it on a bigger
>> machine.
>
>Sure. I was kind of hoping that someone else would implement it,
>because
>I'm a reviewer on this one, and I do not have the bigger machine at
>hand
>either:-) If nothing happens and when I have some time, I'll do it.

It wasn't specifically aimed at you...

>> It can't take very long to implement tosimply just write to one
>> file instead of the multiple files as now.
>
>Sure.
>
>> The posix guaranteed fprintf locking should already take care of the
>> rest.
>
>I think I would try with snprintf to reduce locking.

Glibc's locking is around the streambuffer IIRC. So that's not likely to do much...

--
Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone.

Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-03-23 19:20:35 Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-03-23 19:07:21 Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric