Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions
Date: 2016-02-19 02:53:11
Message-ID: 56C68397.1000701@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/18/16 12:20 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
> Just to be clear, AFAIK there is no issue with the committed changes on
> Windows. If there is please provide a concrete example that we can discuss.

Originally it was mentioned that this feature could be used in the
regression tests by making certain tests conditional on configure
options. Which presumably won't work if the build was on Windows.

I don't doubt that your code actually works on Windows.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Takashi Horikawa 2016-02-19 02:58:08 Typo in bufmgr.c that result in waste of memory
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-02-19 02:51:26 Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions