| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions |
| Date: | 2016-02-17 17:15:20 |
| Message-ID: | 56C4AAA8.4060508@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/17/2016 02:32 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Actually, having second-thoughts on the matter, why is is that
> necessary to document the function pg_config()? The functions wrapping
> a system view just have the view documented, take for example
> pg_show_all_file_settings, pg_show_all_settings,
> pg_stat_get_wal_receiver, etc.
Ok, removed the documentation on the function pg_config() and pushed.
Included bumped catversion.
Joe
--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Álvaro Hernández Tortosa | 2016-02-17 17:25:30 | Re: [HACKERS] Packaging of postgresql-jdbc |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-02-17 16:58:04 | Re: Fix handling of invalid sockets returned by PQsocket() |