Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc
Date: 2016-02-16 12:29:13
Message-ID: 56C31619.6040104@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/15/2016 07:57 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 07:31:40PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> Oh, crap. I didn't realize that TEMP_CONFIG didn't affect the contrib
>>> test suites. Is there any reason for that, or is it just kinda where
>>> we ended up?
>> To my knowledge, it's just the undesirable place we ended up.
> Yeah. +1 for fixing that, if it's not unreasonably painful.
>
>

+1 for fixing it everywhere.

Historical note: back when TEMP_CONFIG was implemented, the main
regression set was just about the only set of tests the buildfarm ran
using a temp install. That wasn't even available for contrib and the
PLs, IIRC.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-02-16 12:39:51 Re: Remove or weaken hints about "effective resolution of sleep delays is 10 ms"?
Previous Message Pavel Kajaba 2016-02-16 12:15:50 Packaging of postgresql-jdbc