Re: Windows performance

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Windows performance
Date: 2016-02-12 19:22:46
Message-ID: 56BE3106.4040404@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 2/12/2016 8:09 AM, Sterpu Victor wrote:
> The query is very big but I pasted it at the end of the mail with the
> EXPLAIN ANALYZE.

I ran that explain through Depesz's 'explain' analyzer.
http://explain.depesz.com/s/c7ts

there's a lot(!) of small steps in that query. I'm going to hazard a
guess that the issue is related to semaphore overhead or something like
that.

certainly, ti would be good to benchmark both OS's on the same version
of postgres, comparing 9.1 to 9.5 isn't fair.

--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2016-02-12 19:49:30 Re: Windows performance
Previous Message John R Pierce 2016-02-12 18:57:34 Re: PosgreSQL Security Architecture