Re: Mac OS: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8"

From: Artur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stas Kelvich <stas(dot)kelvich(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Mac OS: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8"
Date: 2016-02-11 08:14:50
Message-ID: 56BC42FA.10509@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11.02.2016 01:19, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Artur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> writes:
>>> I think this is not a bug. It is a normal behavior. In Mac OS sscanf()
>>> with the %s format reads the string one character at a time. The size of
>>> letter 'Ñ…' is 2. And sscanf() separate it into two wrong characters.
>
>> That argument might be convincing if OSX behaved that way for all
>> multibyte characters, but it doesn't seem to be doing that. Why is
>> only 'Ñ…' affected?
>
> I looked into the OS X sources, and found that indeed you are right:
> *scanf processes the input a byte at a time, and applies isspace() to
> each byte separately, even when the locale is such that that's a clearly
> insane thing to do. Since this code was derived from FreeBSD, FreeBSD
> has or once had the same issue. (A look at the freebsd project on github
> says it still does, assuming that's the authoritative repo.) Not sure
> about other BSDen.
>
> I also verified that in UTF8-based locales, isspace() thinks that 0x85 and
> 0xA0, and no other high-bit-set values, are spaces. Not sure exactly why
> it thinks that, but that explains why 'Ñ…' fails when adjacent code points
> don't.
>
> So apparently the coding rule we have to adopt is "don't use *scanf()
> on data that might contain multibyte characters". (There might be corner
> cases where it'd work all right for conversion specifiers other than %s,
> but probably you might as well just use strtol and friends in such cases.)
> Ugh.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

Yes, I meant this. The second byte divides the word into two wrong pieces.

Sorry for my unclear explanation. I should to explain more clearly.

--
Artur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2016-02-11 08:15:01 Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2016-02-11 07:27:22 Re: proposal: function parse_ident