| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: remove wal_level archive |
| Date: | 2016-02-07 21:47:22 |
| Message-ID: | 56B7BB6A.1090702@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/26/16 10:56 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Removing one of "archive" or "hot standby" will just cause confusion and
> breakage, so neither is a good choice for removal.
>
> What we should do is
> 1. Map "archive" and "hot_standby" to one level with a new name that
> indicates that it can be used for both/either backup or replication.
> (My suggested name for the new level is "replica"...)
> 2. Deprecate "archive" and "hot_standby" so that those will be removed
> in a later release.
Updated patch to reflect these suggestions.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-Merge-wal_level-archive-and-hot_standby-into-new-.patch | application/x-patch | 19.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-02-07 22:01:36 | Re: Parallel Aggregate |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-02-07 20:29:16 | evaluating target list in parallel workers |