Re: UNIQUE capability to hash indexes

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: UNIQUE capability to hash indexes
Date: 2016-02-04 18:19:52
Message-ID: 56B39648.10907@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/4/16 1:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I wanted to know if anyone is working on these projects from todo list.
>> 1.Add UNIQUE capability to hash indexes
>> 2.Allow multi-column hash indexes
>
> Not that I've heard of. It's very hard to muster any enthusiasm for
> improving hash indexes unless their lack of WAL-logging is fixed first.

+1.

I currently steer customers away from hash indexes and have never used
them for any project myself. They are simply not safe.

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-02-04 19:17:55 Re: [REVIEW] In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.
Previous Message Victor Wagner 2016-02-04 18:18:41 Re: [REVIEW] In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.