Re: PostgreSQL Audit Extension

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Audit Extension
Date: 2016-02-01 19:32:10
Message-ID: 56AFB2BA.8070706@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/31/16 8:07 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> David Steele wrote:
>> The attached patch implements audit logging for PostgreSQL as an
>> extension. I believe I have addressed the concerns that were raised at
>> the end of the 9.5 development cycle.
>
> This patch got no feedback at all during the commitfest. I think there
> is some interest on auditing capabilities so it's annoying and
> surprising that this has no movement at all.

Yes, especially since I've had queries at conferences, by email, and
once on this list asking if it would be submitted again. I would not
have taken the time to prepare it if I hadn't been getting positive
feedback.

> If the lack of activity means lack of interest, please can we all keep
> what we've been doing in this thread, which is to ignore it, so that we
> can just mark this as rejected.

If nobody comments or reviews then that would be the best course of action.

> I'm giving
> this patch some more time by moving it to next commitfest instead.

I was under the mistaken impression that the CF was two months long so I
appreciate getting more time.

Thanks,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum 2016-02-01 20:24:21 pl/pgSQL, get diagnostics and big data
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2016-02-01 18:03:45 Re: Re: PATCH: Split stats file per database WAS: autovacuum stress-testing our system