Re: Implementing a new Scripting Language

From: "Igal (at) Lucee(dot)org" <igal(at)lucee(dot)org>
To: jflack <jflack(at)math(dot)purdue(dot)edu>, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Implementing a new Scripting Language
Date: 2016-01-27 18:17:35
Message-ID: 56A909BF.1050001@lucee.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/27/2016 9:58 AM, jflack wrote:
> I just did a quick search on Lucee and what I found suggests that
> it compiles to JVM bytecode and runs on a JVM. If that is the
> case, and it can compile methods that will have the sort of
> method signatures PL/Java expects, and you can put the .class
> files in a jar and load it, your job should be just about done. :)
yes, Lucee uses ASM4 to construct class files which are mostly POJOs
> Or, you might end up writing thin wrappers in Java, probably
> nothing more.
>
> Another possibility: Java has pluggable script engine support
> (java specification request 233, see the javax.script package).
> Does Lucee have an existing JSR 233 engine implementation?
the next version of Lucee (currently in Beta) does support JSR-223,
which I actually mentioned as a viable solution in my first email in
this thread. That would be awesome if PL/Java would support JSR-223.

thanks,

Igal

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Igal @ Lucee.org 2016-01-27 18:21:13 Re: Implementing a new Scripting Language
Previous Message Chapman Flack 2016-01-27 18:03:26 Re: Implementing a new Scripting Language