| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Berend Tober <btober(at)computer(dot)org>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: A motion |
| Date: | 2016-01-23 23:31:02 |
| Message-ID: | 56A40D36.9000503@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 01/23/2016 03:08 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 01/23/2016 03:03 PM, Berend Tober wrote:
>> Adrian Klaver wrote:
>>> Motion:
>>>
>>> The Coc discussion be moved to its own list where those who care can
>>> argue to their hearts content and leave the rest of us to deal with
>>> technical questions. Upon a decision on said list the result be posted
>>> to the Postgres web site for consideration.
>>
>> Been suggested already, and rejected:
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/56970135.6060203@computer.org
>
> I'm an optimist.
With respect Adrian, that is a motion that never stands a chance. If you
don't want to read it, set up a filter that sends it right to the round
file.
JD
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2016-01-23 23:39:46 | Re: Let's Do the CoC Right |
| Previous Message | Johannes | 2016-01-23 23:13:27 | Re: long transfer time for binary data |