Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions
Date: 2016-01-19 07:20:41
Message-ID: 569DE3C9.1050408@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01/19/2016 08:03 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tomas Vondra
> <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>
...
>>> Tomas, I am planning to have a look at that, because it seems to be
>>> important. In case it becomes lost on my radar, do you mind if I add
>>> it to the 2016-03 CF?
>>
>>
>> Well, what else can I do? I have to admit I'm quite surprised this is still
>> rotting here, considering it addresses a rather serious data loss /
>> corruption issue on pretty common setup.
>
> Well, I think you did what you could. And we need to be sure now that
> it gets in and that this patch gets a serious lookup. So for now my
> guess is that not loosing track of it would be a good first move. I
> have added it here to attract more attention:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/9/484/

Ah, thanks. I haven't realized it's not added into 2016-1 (I'd swear I
added it into the CF app).

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2016-01-19 07:33:58 Re: postgres_fdw join pushdown (was Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-01-19 07:14:58 Re: Re: BUG #13685: Archiving while idle every archive_timeout with wal_level hot_standby