From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(dot)berkus(at)pgexperts(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions |
Date: | 2016-01-17 22:24:46 |
Message-ID: | 569C14AE.5080506@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/16/2016 06:02 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
>> 1) Change NextXID output format from "%u/%u" to "%u:%u"
>> (see recent hackers thread)
>
> ! printf(_("Latest checkpoint's NextXID: %u/%u\n"),
> ControlFile.checkPointCopy.nextXidEpoch,
> ControlFile.checkPointCopy.nextXid);
> printf(_("Latest checkpoint's NextOID: %u\n"),
> --- 646,652 ----
> ControlFile.checkPointCopy.ThisTimeLineID);
> printf(_("Latest checkpoint's full_page_writes: %s\n"),
> ControlFile.checkPointCopy.fullPageWrites ? _("on") : _("off"));
> ! printf(_("Latest checkpoint's NextXID: %u:%u\n"),
> This should be definitely a separate patch.
Ok. Notwithstanding Simon's reply, there seems to be consensus that this
is the way to go. Will commit it this way unless some additional
objections surface in the next day or so.
Joe
--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2016-01-17 22:29:05 | Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2016-01-17 22:20:32 | Re: dblink: add polymorphic functions. |