Re: Why not represent "never vacuumed" accurately wrt pg_class.relpages?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why not represent "never vacuumed" accurately wrt pg_class.relpages?
Date: 2018-12-11 19:28:50
Message-ID: 5697.1544556530@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> To me the whole logic around this largely seems to be cargo culting
> things forward.

Well, feel free to propose some other behavior --- but I'm more
worried about how badly it will fail when wrong than whether the
plans are better when right.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-12-11 20:38:46 Re: Sketch of a fix for that truncation data corruption issue
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-12-11 19:11:30 Re: Why not represent "never vacuumed" accurately wrt pg_class.relpages?