Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Vinayak Pokale <vinpokale(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, pokurev(at)pm(dot)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.
Date: 2016-01-12 02:21:36
Message-ID: 56946330.1010600@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016/01/12 10:30, Amit Langote wrote:
> I'm slightly concerned that the latest patch doesn't incorporate any
> revisions to the original pgstat interface per Robert's comments in [1].

I meant to say "originally proposed pgstat interface on this thread".

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2016-01-12 02:26:53 Re: pg_conversion seems rather strangely defined
Previous Message Amit Langote 2016-01-12 01:30:28 Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.