| From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Multi-tenancy with RLS |
| Date: | 2016-01-07 05:31:01 |
| Message-ID: | 568DF815.7060906@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016/01/06 13:07, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Amit Langote
>>
>> Patch 4_database_catalog_tenancy_v5 fails to apply:
>
> May be you missed to apply the 3_shared_catalog_tenancy_v4 path,
> because 4_database_catalog_tenancy_v5 patch depends on it.
Oops, I even missed patches 1 and 2 at all.
>
> Here I attached all the patches for your convenience, I am able to
> apply all patches in the order without any problem.
Okay, thanks!
I applied all the patches. I have a basic question. Sorry though if I've
entirely missed the point (and/or scope) of your proposal. I wonder if
something like the following should not have failed with the patch:
postgres=# CREATE POLICY class_policy ON pg_class TO PUBLIC USING
(relowner = current_user);
ERROR: permission denied: "pg_class" is a system catalog
Is there no support yet for user-defined catalog policies?
Regards,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-01-07 06:14:25 | Re: Function and view to retrieve WAL receiver status |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2016-01-07 05:24:18 | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers |