Re: funcs.sgml - wrong example

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: funcs.sgml - wrong example
Date: 2022-06-01 14:41:38
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 03:08:32AM +0200, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>> funcs.sgml has
>> 42 <@ '{[1,7)}'::int4multirange
>> and calls it true. The attached fixes that.
>> Included are two more changes where actual output differs a bit from what
>> the doc examples show.

> This patch is RFC but seems to have been forgotten.
> Feel free to add it to the next CF if nobody applies it.

Pushed now. I modified that example to 4 <@ '{[1,7)}'::int4multirange
so that it would indeed return true, which is our usual style.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Przemysław Sztoch 2022-06-01 14:45:16 Re: generate_series for timestamptz and time zone problem
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-06-01 14:22:06 plperl tests fail with latest Perl 5.36