| From: | Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: cannot get stable function to use index |
| Date: | 2015-12-30 15:55:38 |
| Message-ID: | 5683FE7A.7090307@squeakycode.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 12/30/2015 9:53 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net> writes:
>> Here are my results, if there are any others you'd like to see please
>> let me know. Thanks Tom.
>
> For comparison, could we see the results for the non-partial case, ie
>
> explain analyze
> select *
> from search
> where search_vec @@ to_tsquery('213 & E & 13 & ST & N');
>
> regards, tom lane
>
QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bitmap Heap Scan on search (cost=6.00..7.02 rows=1 width=100) (actual
time=0.029..0.029 rows=0 loops=1)
Recheck Cond: (search_vec @@ to_tsquery('213 & E & 13 & ST & N'::text))
-> Bitmap Index Scan on search_key (cost=0.00..6.00 rows=1
width=0) (actual time=0.025..0.025 rows=0 loops=1)
Index Cond: (search_vec @@ to_tsquery('213 & E & 13 & ST &
N'::text))
Total runtime: 0.060 ms
(5 rows)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andy Colson | 2015-12-30 16:02:01 | Re: cannot get stable function to use index |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-12-30 15:53:08 | Re: cannot get stable function to use index |