Re: Testing Postgresql 9.5 RC1 with Alfresco 5.0.d

From: Boriss Mejias <bmejias(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Testing Postgresql 9.5 RC1 with Alfresco 5.0.d
Date: 2015-12-29 16:13:52
Message-ID: 5682B140.2000704@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote on 29/12/15 05:31:
[...]
> Thanks for testing.
>
> Do you have any comments on performance testing?

Not really, because I didn't have an equivalent environment to compare. These
tests took exactly the same time as another one with Postgresql 9.3, with a
major different in the setting of the server:

Postgresql 9.5 RC1
1 GB of RAM
1 vCPU Intel
CentOS 6.5

vs

Postgresql 9.3
8 GB of RAM
4 vCPU LPAR
Redhat 6.5 PowerLinux

So, I can't really compare. So, definitely no performance degradation, and
possible a performance gain. But of course, this could all be the fault of Alfresco.

Discussing with the Alfresco community I found a benchmarking test which I'm not
familiar with. I'll make sure to include that test next time I test a
pre-release version of Postgresql, and I'll make sure to have equivalent
environment to test.

> Are there any opportunities to improve Alfresco using the new features in
> PostgreSQL 9.5?

I'm not an Alfresco developer, but I'll try to contact the Alfresco engineers to
discuss this.

> Thanks

You're welcome and I hope next tests will include some performance measurements
a part from just compliance tests.

Cheers
Boriss

>
> --
> Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ <http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-12-29 16:21:49 Re: Making tab-complete.c easier to maintain
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-12-29 16:07:26 Better detail logging for password auth failures