| From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: GIN data corruption bug(s) in 9.6devel |
| Date: | 2015-12-21 19:51:09 |
| Message-ID: | 5678582D.3000601@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/21/2015 07:41 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Tomas Vondra
> <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
...
>> So both patches seem to do the trick, but (2) is faster. Not sure
>> if this is expected. (BTW all the results are without asserts
>> enabled).
>
> Do you know what the size of the pending list was at the end of each
> test?
>
> I think last one may be faster because it left a large mess behind
> that someone needs to clean up later.
No. How do I measure it?
>
> Also, do you have the final size of the indexes in each case?
No, I haven't realized the patches do affect that, so I haven't measured it.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-12-21 19:55:50 | Re: Re: Reusing abbreviated keys during second pass of ordered [set] aggregates |
| Previous Message | Chapman Flack | 2015-12-21 19:30:12 | Re: tracking owner of extension-managed objects |