Re: Cube extension kNN support

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Stas Kelvich <stas(dot)kelvich(at)gmail(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Cube extension kNN support
Date: 2015-12-16 13:46:52
Message-ID: 56716B4C.7000001@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 12/16/2015 01:26 PM, Stas Kelvich wrote:
> Hi, thanks for the review.
>
>> 1) (nitpicking) There seem to be some minor whitespace issues, i.e.
>> trailing spaces, empty lines being added/removed, etc.
>
>
> Fixed, I think
>
>> 2) one of the regression tests started to fail
>>
>> SELECT '-1e-700'::cube AS cube;
>>
>> This used to return (0) but now I get (-0).
>
> Actually that problem emerged because of the first problem. I had
extra whitespace in sql file and removed that whitespace from one of the
answers file (cube_1.sql), so diff with both cube.sql and cube_1.sql was
one line length and you saw diff with cube.sql.
> In all systems that available to me (osx/linux/freebsd) I saw that
right answers file is cube_1.sql. But in other OS’es you can get +/- 0
or e27/e027. I edited that answers files manually, so there probably can
be some other typos.

Ah! So that's why I couldn't quickly find the issue in the C code ...

>
>> 3) I wonder why the docs were changed like this:
>>
>> <para>
>> - It does not matter which order the opposite corners of a cube are
>> - entered in. The <type>cube</> functions
>> - automatically swap values if needed to create a uniform
>> - <quote>lower left &mdash; upper right</> internal representation.
>> + When corners coincide cube stores only one corner along with a
>> special flag in order to reduce size wasted.
>> </para>
>>
>> Was the old behavior removed? I don't think so - it seems to behave
>> as before, so why to remove this information? Maybe it's not useful?
>> But then why add the bit about optimizing storage of points?
>
> I’ve edited it because the statement was mislead (or at least ambiguous) — cube_in function doesn’t swap coordinates.
> Simple way to see it:
>> select '(1,3),(3,1)'::cube;
> cube
> ---------------
> (1, 3),(3, 1)
>
> But LowerLeft-UpperRight representation should be (1,1),(3,3)

I don't think that's what the comment says, actually. It rather refers
to code like this:

result = Min(LL_COORD(c, n - 1), UR_COORD(c, n - 1));

i.e. if you specifically ask for a particular corner (ll, in this case),
you'll get the proper value.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-12-16 14:03:07 Re: Re: Potential pointer dereference in plperl.c (caused by transforms patch)
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2015-12-16 13:30:04 Re: [PoC] Asynchronous execution again (which is not parallel)