Re: Bug in pg_get_ruledef?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Sergio Pili <sergiop(at)sinectis(dot)com(dot)ar>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Laura Celia Rivero <lrivero(at)exa(dot)unicen(dot)edu(dot)ar>, Jorge Doorn <jdoorn(at)exa(dot)unicen(dot)edu(dot)ar>
Subject: Re: Bug in pg_get_ruledef?
Date: 2001-11-25 23:05:37
Message-ID: 5661.1006729537@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Sergio Pili <sergiop(at)sinectis(dot)com(dot)ar> writes:
> test=# select * from pg_rules;
> ERROR: Invalid attnum 3 for rangetable entry *SELECT*

Problem confirmed here. Will look at it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-11-25 23:17:07 Re: Change in rule behavior?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-11-25 22:58:49 Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?