Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user

From: "Maksim Likharev" <mlikharev(at)aurigin(dot)com>
To: "Avi Schwartz" <avi(at)CFFtechnologies(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user
Date: 2003-06-12 03:24:59
Message-ID: 56510AAEF435D240958D1CE8C6B1770A016D2D3B@mailc03.aurigin.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

My I ask on what operations PG better than MSSQL?

cause out of my observations only spatial data types,
could influence a choice between MSSQL and PG.

Thank you.

-----Original Message-----
From: Avi Schwartz [mailto:avi(at)CFFtechnologies(dot)com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 8:12 PM
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user

From Microsoft SQL Server 7. We looked briefly at MySQL but realized
that the features we need will not be out until at least version 5
while PostgreSQL has them now.

Avi

On Wednesday, Jun 11, 2003, at 21:34 America/Chicago, Maksim Likharev
wrote:

> Could you clarify are you moving from MySQL or Microsoft SQL 7.0?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avi Schwartz
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 7:21 PM
> To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user
>
>
> We are currently in the middle of a process of moving from SQL Server
7
> to PostgreSQL.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2003-06-12 03:31:38 Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM
Previous Message Avi Schwartz 2003-06-12 03:12:00 Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user