From: | "Maksim Likharev" <mlikharev(at)aurigin(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Avi Schwartz" <avi(at)CFFtechnologies(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user |
Date: | 2003-06-12 03:24:59 |
Message-ID: | 56510AAEF435D240958D1CE8C6B1770A016D2D3B@mailc03.aurigin.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
My I ask on what operations PG better than MSSQL?
cause out of my observations only spatial data types,
could influence a choice between MSSQL and PG.
Thank you.
-----Original Message-----
From: Avi Schwartz [mailto:avi(at)CFFtechnologies(dot)com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 8:12 PM
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user
From Microsoft SQL Server 7. We looked briefly at MySQL but realized
that the features we need will not be out until at least version 5
while PostgreSQL has them now.
Avi
On Wednesday, Jun 11, 2003, at 21:34 America/Chicago, Maksim Likharev
wrote:
> Could you clarify are you moving from MySQL or Microsoft SQL 7.0?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avi Schwartz
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 7:21 PM
> To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user
>
>
> We are currently in the middle of a process of moving from SQL Server
7
> to PostgreSQL.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2003-06-12 03:31:38 | Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM |
Previous Message | Avi Schwartz | 2003-06-12 03:12:00 | Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user |