From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c |
Date: | 2015-11-16 12:51:36 |
Message-ID: | 5649D158.1010900@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/15/2015 08:24 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 11/15/15 9:53 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> I suggest you review the original thread on this subject before a line
>> was ever written. "multiple" (see subject line on this whole thread) is
>> clearly what is being asked for. Making people turn that into a single
>> argument is not what was envisaged. See for example Pavel's original
>> example involving use of xargs where that's clearly not at all easy.
> I can see (small) value in having a new option that is like -c but
> interprets the string as a fully-featured script like -f. (Small
> because the same behavior can already be had with here strings in bash.)
>
> The behavior should be exactly like -f, including all the behavior with
> single-transaction and single-step modes or whatever.
>
> But then I will point out that we currently don't handle multiple -f
> options.
>
>
If we can only have one I would say the value is vanishingly small.
As to -f, I don't see why we shouldn't allow multiple such options, only
that nobody has bothered to do it.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2015-11-16 13:17:00 | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
Previous Message | Artur Zakirov | 2015-11-16 12:51:10 | Re: [PROPOSAL] Improvements of Hunspell dictionaries support |