Re: Request: pg_cancel_backend variant that handles 'idle in transaction' sessions

From: Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Request: pg_cancel_backend variant that handles 'idle in transaction' sessions
Date: 2015-11-05 20:59:30
Message-ID: 563BC332.4060808@2ndquadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/05/2015 09:01 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> Tom noted earlier some caveats with the 'idle' timeout in terms of
> implementation. Maybe that needs to be zeroed in on.

AFAIK, those issues have already been solved by Andres some time ago.
--
Vik Fearing +33 6 46 75 15 36
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2015-11-05 21:01:16 Beta2 Next week
Previous Message Joe Conway 2015-11-05 20:59:13 Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql