Re: September 2015 Commitfest

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: September 2015 Commitfest
Date: 2015-11-02 00:41:59
Message-ID: 5636B157.4090504@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/31/15 11:19 AM, Nathan Wagner wrote:
>> >You could imagine putting something into the standard makefiles
>> >that did some subset of this, but I think it would be too rigid
>> >to be useful.
> I think it would be very useful to just be able to tell the system "fire
> this up for me so I can test it". I don't think it needs to handle
> every possible testing scenario, just making it easier to leave up the
> test postmaster from make check would be very useful, at least to me.

I've wished that the cluster setup and teardown behavior of pg_regress
was available outside of pg_regress itself. Would that mostly suffice
for what you're looking for?
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-11-02 02:33:28 Re: September 2015 Commitfest
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-11-02 00:23:34 Re: COPY (INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING ..)