From: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: September 2015 Commitfest |
Date: | 2015-11-02 00:41:59 |
Message-ID: | 5636B157.4090504@BlueTreble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/31/15 11:19 AM, Nathan Wagner wrote:
>> >You could imagine putting something into the standard makefiles
>> >that did some subset of this, but I think it would be too rigid
>> >to be useful.
> I think it would be very useful to just be able to tell the system "fire
> this up for me so I can test it". I don't think it needs to handle
> every possible testing scenario, just making it easier to leave up the
> test postmaster from make check would be very useful, at least to me.
I've wished that the cluster setup and teardown behavior of pg_regress
was available outside of pg_regress itself. Would that mostly suffice
for what you're looking for?
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-11-02 02:33:28 | Re: September 2015 Commitfest |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-11-02 00:23:34 | Re: COPY (INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING ..) |