Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Mailing Lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.
Date: 2015-10-30 17:21:53
Message-ID: 5633A731.60700@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

On 10/30/2015 08:29 AM, Christopher Browne wrote:
> I think it makes the feature WORSE. I am getting more and more convinced
> that the Correct Solution is for this feature to be handled by submitting
> multiple URIs, and my argument isn't even based on any aspects of
> implementation complexity.

+1

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2015-10-30 18:38:38 Re: pgxs/config/missing is... missing
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2015-10-30 17:01:07 Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2015-11-02 17:15:48 Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.
Previous Message David Fetter 2015-10-30 16:23:31 Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.