Re: Within CF app, "Bug Fixes" should be "Bug Fixes/Refactoring"

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Within CF app, "Bug Fixes" should be "Bug Fixes/Refactoring"
Date: 2015-10-29 20:14:44
Message-ID: 56327E34.5000104@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/29/2015 01:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I think that within the CF app, we should either rename the patch
>>> topic "Bug Fixes" to "Bug Fixes/Refactoring", or introduce a new
>>> "Refactoring" topic. I prefer the first approach.
>
>> I would vote for the second approach, with a separate category for refactoring.
>
> Ditto. Bug fixes are not at all like refactoring --- in particular, we'd
> usually not consider refactoring as fit material for back-patching.
>
> "Refactoring" seems rather a narrow definition of what might show up
> in such a category, btw. Maybe "Code Beautification" would be a
> suitable title? I'm bikeshedding though.

"Miscellaneous"?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-10-29 20:16:40 Re: Are we sufficiently clear that jsonb containment is nested?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-10-29 20:10:31 Re: Within CF app, "Bug Fixes" should be "Bug Fixes/Refactoring"