| From: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ian Barwick <ian(dot)barwick(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add %x to PROMPT1 and PROMPT2 |
| Date: | 2020-02-06 02:56:54 |
| Message-ID: | 560f1eb3-5b43-eade-1c87-15c7d83130a8@postgresfriends.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/02/2020 03:38, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 10:21:11AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> I'm not really against this change but, given how long it's been the
>>> way that it is, I think we shouldn't make it without more plus votes.
>>> If we've actually got a broad consensus on it, sure, but I don't think
>>> 4 votes is a broad consensus.
>>
>> Fair point. I'm still abstaining, but maybe this should be proposed
>> on pgsql-general to try to get more opinions?
>
> Indeed, still I am not sure what kind of number is enough to define a
> large consensus. Vik, could you start a new thread on -general?
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/3d8e809b-fc26-87c5-55ac-616a98d2b0be%40postgresfriends.org
--
Vik Fearing
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2020-02-06 03:09:08 | Re: Is custom MemoryContext prohibited? |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2020-02-06 02:50:29 | Re: Assumptions about the number of parallel workers |