Re: [PATCH] ecpg: fix progname memory leak

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ecpg: fix progname memory leak
Date: 2020-10-09 08:47:23
Message-ID: 56065755-E7FB-46D0-912D-E525D3E6AD09@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 8 Oct 2020, at 19:08, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> OK, TODO removed.

Potentially controversial proposal: Should we perhaps remove (for some value
of) the TODO list altogether?

The value of the list is questionable as it's not actually a TODO list for
established developers, and for aspiring new developers it's unlikely to give
good ideas for where to start (I know there's a big warning but not everyone
will read everything, the page is quite long).

Now, I don't actually suggest we *remove* it, as there is valuable curated
content, but that we rename it to something which won't encourage newcomers to
pick something from the list simply because it exists. The name "TODO" implies
that the list is something which it isn't.

Thoughts?

cheers ./daniel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2020-10-09 08:49:24 Re: Logical replication CPU-bound with TRUNCATE/DROP/CREATE many tables
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-10-09 08:46:58 Re: Wrong statistics for size of XLOG_SWITCH during pg_waldump.